Latest Posts

Showing posts with label aliens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aliens. Show all posts


Everyone loves a good conspiracy theory. in the very least they're imaginative.

This week i hand the reighns over to Stuart from The Collect Call of cthulhu for a guest post on one of the most intriguing 'secret' organisations of them all: the Majestic Twelve.
if you liked it, please make sure to head over to his blog and show him some support here.






The Shockingly Dull Truth Behind the Majestic Twelve...

Majestic 12 is one of those wonderful bits of conspiracy theory that just seems so right. It’s up there with Area 51, Roswell and the Men in Black as one of the cornerstones of in popular culture when we think of shadowy government conspiracies involving little grey men from half a galaxy away. A mysterious cabal of politicians, scientists and military officers dealing with aliens and recovered alien technology, exploiting it for nefarious purposes, and directing the course of mankind from their smoky, ill-lit conference room has become something of a clichĂ© in ufology fiction, from the Conspiracy in The X-Files, the Majestic-12 of Delta Green, or a more benign example with the X-COM organisation of the games of the same name (or XCOM, if you want to be picky).
And like all things that seem so right when it comes to conspiracy theories, it’s absolute bollocks.
The story goes that President Harry S. Truman set up Majestic 12 (Or MJ12, or Majik-12) in the early Fifties, to facilitate the recovery and research of alien technology. The “12” comes from the alleged twelve members of the steering committee, all respected and notable in their fields. This all came about after the Roswell Incident, which as far as anyone can really tell, wasn’t an incident at all. The purpose of the committee was to cover up the Roswell Incident, study the recovered UFO, and work out how to deal with further interactions with extra-terrestrials. As the Roswell Incident was in fact just a Project Mogul weather balloon that had crashed (designed to study Soviet atomic weapon tests, so understandably the US government wouldn’t want to talk about it at the start of the Cold War) it does rather shoot a fatal hole in this, but just run with the idea it was actually a UFO full of aliens from Zeta Reticuli (I wonder if they visited LV426 on the way out) for the moment. Well, we could if there was anything else to go on. After that, the “facts” such as they are rather fall apart, and we’re flying blind and left to wade in the seething sea of conspiracy theorist bullshit.




The documents apparently were left to sit for the best part of forty years, only to be discovered in the Eighties by ufologists searching for matter related to the Roswell Incident (which, with the Soviet Union still a thing, the US government was still rather reluctant to admit to). However, it’s become clear beyond any reasonable doubt the Majestic 12 Papers were a forgery, with the FBI investigating the matter only to confirm it was fake. A US Air Force investigation also confirmed the documents were fake, and that no such committee was ever formed, and no “Operation Majestic 12” ever took place. Of course, all the US government investigations in the world can’t convince anyone if they assume the US government is in on it, hiding the truth from the public at large, but as near as anyone can tell, Majestic 12 never existed until the Eighties. Just who or why the papers were planted is something of a mystery, but it’s not too much of a stretch to assume it was the people who “found” it in the first place.
Jaime Shandera is the first of the three. A television producer in Los Angeles, he apparently received a package that contained some film that, when developed, showed a handful of pages from the Majestic 12 documents. Beyond this, there isn’t a huge amount about him online, so as the story moves onto how the full set of documents was found, it makes sense to move onto the other two people who “found” the Majestic 12 papers. Apparently Shandera, Stanton T. Friedman and Bill Moore later received mysterious messages that directed them to another document, the Cutler/Twining Memo. These have been held up to prove the legitimacy of the Majestic 12 papers, but much like the papers themselves, the Cutler/Twining Memo is regarded as a rather shabby fake. So who are the other two?
Stanton T Friedman
Stanton T. Friedman is a ufologist, but before that, he was a nuclear physicist who worked in research and development for a list of rather reputable companies. In the Seventies, he jacked that in to become an expert on UFOs and has made a rather nice career out of it, lecturing and consulting on the subject around the globe, even appearing before the United Nations in this capacity twice. He’s also rather defensive about the legitimacy of the Majestic 12 papers, and apparently gets little opposition at his lectures. Of course, I’d argue a lot of this is down to the fact outside of a handful of people who make it their business to debunk wooly thinking, most people don’t read up heavily on subjects they consider to be hogwash. In my own experience dealing with 9/11 “Truthers” I will happily concede they have the edge on me in regards to various aspects of minutiae, but that’s because I don’t spend my life trying to see the holes in the official story. People who aren’t spending their lives immersed in conspiracy theories, who probably find them to be utter bunkum, aren’t going to be able to point out the flaws because they don’t care enough to learn where they are. But I digress.
The third member of this jolly trio was the author Bill Moore, who beyond writing a book on the Roswell Incident, co-authored another on the so-called “Philadelphia Experiment”. In any case, both books were not exactly met with critical acclaim, as even to die-hard believers they were considered pretty awful books. Moore’s reputation isn’t exactly the best, as when the accusing fingers started being pointed about the authenticity of the Majestic 12 papers, they were mainly pointed at him.
A further document came to light in the mid-Nineties, claiming to be an “operations manual”, but it was swiftly debunked. Of course, this isn’t to tar all ufologists with the same brush. There are many out there who freely admit that the Majestic 12 myth is just that, a myth. But there are plenty who cling to the idea, and if you’re of a particularly paranoid frame of mind, you could argue the split caused in the ufology community caused by the reveal and apparent debunking of the papers is part of a shadowy plan to divide and conquer. Of course, that could be exactly what They want you to think. Wheels within wheels, man!
In the end, the Majestic 12 story is an example of a conspiracy theory that seems to have been given a huge amount of life by popular culture, despite the astonishing lack of any hard evidence. Less than two-dozen pages discovered in the mid-Eighties, repeatedly debunked from all angles, and yet it still has life. Like most conspiracy theories, it gives the impression all that is bad and wrong in the world is the fault of someone, that there is a driving intelligence behind everything evil, that there is some grand and malevolent plan. The truth, as near as we can tell, is that there really isn’t, which is probably a lot more terrifying. There was no Roswell UFO to pull apart to get an edge over the wily Soviets, no dead aliens to be dissected under the stern gaze of a very shaky camera, no live ones to be interrogated, and no mysterious committee of twelve overseeing it all for a shadowy purpose. Much like the Illuminati (another conspiracy theory about a mysterious, influential organisation, albeit with slightly more grounding in reality, if only because the Bavarian Illuminati actually existed) they make for great villains and antagonists in fiction, but that’s all they are.







There is an eerie consistency in many alien abduction stories when the victims describe their kidnappers...
A classic design from the movie 'Extraterrestrial'

It's resulted in an all-pervasive image of what an alien looks like. You know it: the pear shaped almost featureless face, smooth skin, tiny nose and mouth and huge almond shaped black eyes.

A typical encounter was recounted by a man named Sebastian:


"It was like three years ago. I saw this ET. It woke me up in the middle of the night, while I was mediating. They exist. If some could go like this and open your eyelids while you're mediating, while you're in deep man there's something out there. It looked like a little kid except it had big eyes, it looked just like a little kid except it had big eyes, small nose and a little mouth. Big eyes, small nose and a little mouth."

 It's dominated our media for decades as the catch-all symbol for extraterrestrial life. But why is the image so consistent? Could it be that all alleged abductees have been hunted by the same alien species; can this consistency of narrative be classified as proof that aliens truly exist?



Maybe.
But a more likely explanation for the consistency of experience could be down to how human consciousness has evolved - and survived- over the millions of years.

In his paper Close Encounters of the Facial Kind, Frederick V. Malmstrom suggests that instead the distinctive character of the alien face is due to an Inborn Facial Recognition Template. In his 1979 collaboration with Richard Coffman he found that out of a random sample of 30 reported aliens 100% were of a median height close to that of the average woman, and 80% displayed prominent diagonally oriented wraparound eyes, double slit nostrils and little or no mouth. In addition, most subjects reported to being between sleep and wakefulness when the encounters happened or later recalled this face when they were put into hypnotic regression. Both states of conciousness are ripe grounds for out of body experiences and hallucinations.

Similar experiments were conducted elsewhere, looking into the possibility that alien

Sketches on Barney Hill's alien kidnapper:
Top Image drawn under hypnosis
with bottom images as artist's
interpretations from his descriptions.
 
 (credit: NICAP 1972)
encounters were actually forms of out of body experiences. Richard Wiseman, in his book Paranormality, states that between 10-20% of the population have experienced out of body experiences when very relaxed, anaesthetised, experiencing sensory deprivation, under the influence of cannabis or following a life threatening situation (such as the famous 'light at the end of the tunnel'). He explains that out of body experiences are the product of the human brain continually seeking to identify where it is and it can be easily tricked. For example, by using mirrors and a dummy hand, along with simultaneous stimulation of their real -hidden- hand, a subject can be tricked into feeling as if the dummy hand is part of them because the confused brain anchors itself to the dummy hand that it is presented with. Out of body experiences are a similar decoupling of identity. When Michael Raduga conducted an experiment at the Out-of-Body-Experience Research Centre in Los Angeles more than half the volunteers he studied experienced at least one full or partial out-of-body experience (following guided relaxation techniques). Seven of the twenty volunteers were able to make supposed contact with UFOS or aliens during these dream like experiences.


In these lucid out of body experiences the brain is uncertain and falls back on a mix of subconscious memory and instinctual programming  and it is here that the Inborn Visual Recognition Template takes hold and gives us the distinctive image of the alien.


So what is the Inborn Visual Recognition Template?
The pupil schematic most favoured by
newborns according to Hess' study

Evolution is a amazing thing. In The Study of Instinct  Niko Tinbergen found that newly hatched chicks were born with an inherent knowledge of their predators and would automatically hide from shadow patterns that resembled dangerous hawks, while ignoring shadow patterns that showed benign geese. Human babies are particularly vulnerable infants and part of a species that survives due to social performance and so similarly are hardwired to recognise faces from the womb. As a matter of survival they respond favourably to these faces and seek them out.
Up until two months old, however, this ability isn't particularly sophisticated and they will seek out anything that has 'face-like' features, whether these are potentially scary - like a halloween mask - or benign. The key seems to be instead the makeup of the face - two eyes and, usually, a nose. Infants ignore one eye or three eyes and focus on two. Similarly, Eckhard hess found that they also respond more favourably to eyes with larger pupils. When I.W.R Bushnell took this research a step further, they found that babies found it easier to recognise a hairless and earless face and that this recognition is hardwired into the hippocampus - a noncortial 'lower' area of the brain. Only later does the baby start to use the 'higher' cortical areas of the brain to add in additional recognition cues such as the hairline and ear.


Another feature of newborn vision that is important to note is their limitations. While there is disagreement as to whether babies are born shortsighted or longsighted either way they will usually only pay attention to objects between 7-25 cm in front of their eyes, with this expanding to around a meter as quickly as one to two days after birth. In addition newborn vision is generally blurred and 'foggy' with very weak or entirely absent colour differentiation. When apply these restrictions to the image of mother's face at a typically intimate distance, the change is quite alarming, and revealing.




The mother's face in the vision of a newborn


Above is the standard mother's face having been reduced down to the vision range expected of a newborn. The second image was reduced to a coarseness of about 150 pixels and a field of a 50 degree visual angle with simulated radial astigmatism and a very shallow depth of focus. The third image smoothed to remove the residual high spacial frequencies 
following the digitization and simulate the 'fogginess' of new born vision.
In the process you can see how the facial recognition is still very clear when using the restrictions of newborn sight and when following the hardwired symbols of the hippocampus. Two large black eyes with large black pupils. Also, interestingly, it's clear to see how an alien face emerges - the large black slanted eyes, the almost non existent mouth, and the vertical slit nostrils, with a hairline blurred. We have our alien.


Sebastian's alien drawing

Aliens: The most primitive face?

During lucid dreaming and in out of body experiences it would be no surprise that the brain dips back into the subconscious and pulls out its most primitive programming.Therefore it seems likely that many of the creatures seen in 'alien abduction' stories aren't actually aliens at all but, fundamentally, an instinctual ghost of the Mother.


But, of course, it would be impossible to leave any article on aliens without returning a little ambiguity to the mix, so I leave you with this quote by Adam Frank, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Rochester in New York:


"You’d be considered a pessimist if you imagined the probability of evolving a civilization on a habitable planet was, say, one in a trillion...But even that guess — one chance in a trillion — implies that what has happened here on Earth with humanity has in fact happened about 10 billion other times over cosmic history."


We may not be getting abducted, but that's not to say that we're alone in the universe, so keep curious and keep questioning, and I shall see you next week.





Other Posts on Aliens...

-The Wonder of Snottites and the Search for Alien Life
-The Race to Europa
-Preludes Recommends: PBS Spacetime
-Review: Paranormality by Richard Wiseman







Keep in touch....
Remember, you can follow Preludes: Blog of Words us on Twitter and Facebook. Or Subscribe to us on Blogluvin' to never miss a post.


Stay curious!

Sources

-This post as heavily influenced by the excellent paper 'Close Encounters of the Facial kind: Are UFO Alien Faces an Inborn Facial Recognition Template' by Frederick V.Malmstrom. At the Skeptic reading room
-The surprising origin of alien abduction stories -LiveScience
-Alien Abductions may be vivid dreams, study shows - LiveScience
-Betty and Barney Hill Abduction Case (Sept 19, 1961) - UFO Evidence.org
-Extraterrestrial movie
-The Universe has Probably Hosted Many Alien civilizations: Study - Space.com 
-Paranormality by Prof. Richard Wiseman
-The real Life X Files - meet people abducted by aliens - DailyMail