Latest Posts

Showing posts with label art history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art history. Show all posts

Back in the day, painting a picture wasn't quite so simple as wandering down to the local Hobbycraft for a pack of paint. Sometimes you'd have to cross whole continents for just the right hue.

The rarity of a colour could render it more valuable than gold, and sometimes particular pigments were found from the strangest of sources. Take for example the earthy brown of a thousands of years old mummy, the sepia tones of cuttlefish ink, the toxic yellow of cadmium or white of lead, or the vibrant red of countless crushed beetles.

The association with colour and value often had more than  just aesthetic value. In many societies, the right to wear certain colours were constricted by class and social standing. For example in Roman times 'Tyrian purple' - a pigment lifted from the secretions of sea snails - was restricted for use of only the emperor alone. 'Prophyrogenitus' was the name of an emperor who gained his throne through dynasty rather than force and meant 'born to purple'.
In Early-Modern England Sumptury laws were common practice and held harsh punishments, especially in Elizabethan times when the new rising middle class merchants often almost bankrupted themselves in the expense of posing in rich colours in order to performatively elevate their own status. For men, the law forbade:

"Cloth of gold, silver, tinseled satin, silk, or cloth mixed or embroidered with any gold or silver: except all degrees above viscounts, and viscounts, barons, and other persons of like degree, in doublets, jerkins, linings of cloaks, gowns, and hose.
Woolen cloth made out of the realm, but in caps only; velvet, crimson, or scarlet; furs, black genets, lucernes; embroidery or tailor's work having gold or silver or pearl therein: except dukes, marquises, earls, and their children, viscounts, barons, and knights being companions of the Garter, or any person being of the Privy Council.

Velvet in gowns, coats, or other uttermost garments; fur of leopards; embroidery with any silk: except men of the degrees above mentioned, barons' sons, knights and gentlemen in ordinary office attendant upon her majesty's person, and such as have been employed in embassages to foreign princes."

Deep blues, purples, crimson, gold and silver were all met with a critical eye, as their wear allowed people's position in society to be identified at a glance. If you were a common man or woman you were permitted to wear brown, beige, yellow, orange, russet, green, grey and a particular blue that was not deep indigo, but was instead the blue created by dying with traditional woad. You can find the full breadth of restrictions for Elizabethan men in a handy table here. 


The library of pigments of course form a fantastic historical record that both emcompases art and sociology and are vital to have as a reference for ageing and identifying historical paintings and their costly forgeries. In Harvard, there is a library dedicated to the preservation of these unique pigments, stored in rainbows of vials as a testament to the enduring value we put on creative expression.


What is your favourite colour? And, perhaps more interestingly, where does it come from?
[ Clearly I have expensive and rather royal tastes: my favourite pigments are always warm red-spectrum purples ;)  ]


Sources

-SophieandHerKind for the original post on tumblr that led me to the article.

Art has grown and developed over the centuries, but bad art is just bad art.

I'd like to share with you this week a brilliant little tumblr that I found called Ancient Art Fails.Taking a look through the full breadth of our noble ancient history, this blog isn't afraid to call a dud a dud.
For example, check out this bad-boy:


Clearly, heaven has plenty of fermented drinks to enjoy and this cherub was caught a little worse for wears when he sat to pose for this sculpture. Somehow the harlot-red lipstick is just the cherry on the top of the cake.


Now I have a real thing for ecclesiastical art. You want to keep this girl happy? Trot me 'round a Cathedral somewhere and let me gawp at the architecture and try to pick out how many pieces of momento mori and pre-reformation survivors I can get my hands on. So let me say with some conviction that this is not a typical piece of stained glass art. This guy is dodgy as all heck and looks like he's nursing a hangover from the same party the lipstick-cherub went to.


Of course it's not just the Christian entities that get the 'ancient art fails' treatment. For example, it's not entirely clear whether this ancient urn is indeed some sort of sheep/goat god/dess...or just has really goofy ears,


And it's not only the gods. The art failure even trickled down to noble pharaohs. This guy, for example, looks rather like he's about to pass wind. Or he's told a very 'funny' joke that he's just waiting for everyone to get. Either way he does look like someone's fun uncle - maybe the artist got it spot on after all.

"But wait!" I hear you cry. "Old art is just old. You cant judge it's quality based on modern standards!"
Believe me, I hear you. Styles do change. But sometimes bad art is just bad, and always will be.
Need proof? Ancient Art Fails provided this little comparison: some gorgeous Roman works of artistic genius.....and the other one.



I guess you get what you pay for.


While the tumblr itself looks quite young, it always welcomes submissions and looks to be something entertaining to keep an eye on. So why not head over there and enjoy our ancestors' less-than-shining moments for yourself?





Sources
http://ancientartfails.tumblr.com/